I have always wondered why scandals are named using the
suffix ‘-gate’ – think ‘Plebgate’, ‘Hackgate’ or ‘Bloodgate’. It turns out that
the reason stems from Watergate – a scandal that changed American politics and
the public’s faith in the president forever.
In May 1972, five men connected with Nixon’s re-election
campaign broke into the Democratic National Committee Office in the Watergate
building and attempted to tap phones and steal top-secret documents. They were
guided by two men from Nixon’s White House in the building opposite by
walkie-talkies. The wiretaps failed and so they returned on the 17th
June when they were arrested. It was not clear that they were connected to the
re-election campaign.
A spokesman for the White House, when asked about the event
a few days later, said that he would not comment on ‘a third-rate burglary’. Two
reporters, Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward began to investigate the crime. They,
on the other hand, thought that this was ‘a professional type operation’ as the
burglars wore surgical gloves and carried thousands of dollars in cash. Now,
they are given much credit for exposing the President’s involvement.
At first, Nixon went to great lengths to attempt to cover up
the crime: he tried to persuade the CIA to stop the FBI from investigating,
evidence was destroyed, staff members who refused to cooperate were fired and
it was arranged that the burglars would be given hundreds of thousands of
dollars to keep quiet. In August of that year, Nixon gave a speech in which he
claimed that he nor his staff were at all involved with the break-in, but FBI
agents discovered in October that the break-in was linked to Nixon’s
re-election campaign. $25,000 for the campaign was found in the bank account of
one of the burglars. However, he was re-elected as President that November
taking more than 60% of the vote.
Hearings surrounding the case began in 1973. Alexander
Butterfield, former appointments secretary to the President, testified that
Nixon had secretly taped every conversation that took place in the Oval Office
since 1971. Prosecutors were determined to get hold of the tapes as they would
provide solid evidence to prove Nixon’s guilt. Archibald Cox, the assigned
special prosecutor for this case, was fired by Nixon when he refused to stop
demanding the tapes. Several Justice Department officials resigned in protest
at this decision on the 20th October 1973. This later became known
as the Saturday Night Massacre. Eventually, Nixon agreed to hand over written summaries
of the tapes, but the White House couldn’t explain why there was an 18 and a
half minute gap in one of them.
During a speech the following month, Nixon says: ‘I’m not a
crook,’ maintaining his innocence. Amid calls for impeachment, he insisted that
he would stay in office, despite increasing unpopularity. He asserted that he
had made mistakes but broken no laws and would not release the tapes, as they
could harm some of his senior staff members. He also claimed that he had not
known of the burglary or the cover-up until early 1973.
On March 1st 1974, seven of Nixon’s former aides
were accused of charges related to the Watergate break-in. Nixon was called an
‘unindicted co-conspirator’ by the jury as they were unsure as to whether they
were able to accuse the current president.
The Supreme Court ordered Nixon to hand over the original
copies of the tapes in July 1974, despite his pleas for presidential privilege.
Meanwhile, the House of Representatives voted to impeach him for obstruction of
justice, abuse of power, criminal cover-up and several violations of the
constitution. The tapes were released on August 5th, proving without
a doubt his complicity in the Watergate crimes. One conversation especially,
from June 23rd 1972, showed that Nixon had played a leading role in
the cover-up. Facing certain impeachment from the Senate, Nixon resigned on
August 8th, becoming the first US president ever to do so.
Nixon’s resignation was only right and really came too late.
This scandal led to further distrust of the government at a time when they were
already divisive due to the Vietnam War. Had he admitted his crimes straight
away rather than devising elaborate plans to cover them up, then the whole
political system would not have been tainted with him. Greater openness and
honesty was subsequently demanded of American politics by the people and this
was met by several reforms.
This is surely a very good blog, thanks a lot for sharing such nice information here. searching here
ReplyDelete