Here are some of the resources which were used to research today's assembly on Emily Davison.
- BBC History article on Emily and her motivation.
- BBC News article considering whether the suffragettes should be labelled as terrorists.
- Article on the plaque unveiled at Tattenham Corner
- Sequence of pictures taken at Derby Day, 1913
- Footage of Emily Davison at the Derby
- Homepage of Claire Balding's "Secrets of a Suffragette" programme (currently not on 4oD)
- Local history account of Emily's death, including a report from The Times on her inquest.
Emily
Davison Assembly 3 July 2013
As many of
you know I cycle to and from school every day and a few weeks ago I decided to
take the scenic route home as the family were away swimming. Having pedalled
hard climbing up Reigate Road, I then headed off to Tattenham Corner and
reached the edge of Epsom Downs.
The reason
for all my pedalling wasn’t just to enjoy the view, although it is spectacular
and I highly recommend a visit, but because I wanted to take a look at a small
section of the racecourse fence, where I had heard that a plaque had recently
been unveiled. It took a bit of finding, as the plaque was quite small, but I
eventually located it, along with several bunches of flowers from the Sutton
and Cheam Labour Party. This was a plaque in memory of Emily Davison, who had
committed a spectacular act on that spot exactly 100 years before my visit.
Emily
Davison was born in London in 1872. She was clearly very bright and won a
bursary in 1892 to study Literature and Modern Foreign Languages at Royal Holloway
College, not far from here in Egham in Surrey. The college had recently been
founded by wealthy philanthropists Thomas and Jane Holloway with the specific
purpose of providing more opportunities for education for women.
Unfortunately
a year later Emily’s father died, and she was unable to afford the tuition fees
so had to drop out. However, she continued to study privately whilst working as
a governess, and eventually got first class honours in her final exams at
Oxford University in 1895. However, as she was a woman, she wasn’t allowed to
be granted a degree – this would only finally come when she took further
qualifications in 1908.
I think it
is worth spending a little time on her early education as it shows the absolute
determination Emily had from the early stages of her life, and also reveals
some of the obstacles she faced as a woman. Whilst she was studying she would
undoubtedly have come into contact with activists demanding greater rights for
women. There had been campaigns for the vote for women for over 30 years but
these had made very little impact until 1903, when the Women’s Social and
Political Union was founded by Emmeline Pankhurst and her daughters Christabel
and Silvia.
Members of the WSPU, or “Suffragettes”
advocated more direct action to achieve the vote. They began by chaining
themselves to railings and causing a public nuisance. Christabel Pankhurst for
example was arrested in 1905 for disrupting a Liberal politician’s speech and
spitting at a policeman. They also held rallies and protests – 700,000 people
attended one event in 1908 – and they even tried to storm the House of Commons.
Emily was
clearly attracted to and motivated by this movement and joined it in 1906. She
was quickly involved in the WSPUs actions as it grew increasingly militant,
using methods such as fire-bombing and vandalism to get its point across. Emily
was involved in a second attempt to storm the House of Commons in 1911, a day
known as “Black Friday” when 117 suffragettes were arrested and allegations
were made of excessive police brutality towards the women. Emily herself was
arrested for breaking two windows. The media and political establishment
portrayed the suffragettes as anti-social, mad-women, even terrorists, and the
chances of achieving the vote still seemed remote.
This was not
Emily’s only visit to Parliament that year. On Sunday 2 April she broke in and
spent the night hiding in a broom cupboard in the crypt of the building. Why?
Because that was the night of the national census and it meant that she could
legitimately give her address – ie the place she had spent the night – as the
House of Commons. Very clever, and very embarrassing for the political
establishment.
Emily went
to prison 9 times for her actions, which included breaking windows and setting
fire to letter boxes. Prison clearly hardened her opinions still further. The
suffragettes demanded the status of political prisoners, and when this was not
granted, went on hunger strike. The government response was force-feeding. I
would like you to try and imagine what this must have felt like.
The
prisoners would have known their time was coming as they heard the footsteps in
the corridor and the sounds of fellow suffragettes struggling in adjacent cells.
They would have then been forced down by the prison guards onto a table, and
their mouths held open with a sort of forceps / scissors device. A tube would
then be pushed down their throat and into the stomach. Sometimes the tube was
incorrectly inserted, damaging the lungs. Sometimes, if the woman refused to
open her mouth, it was pushed down a nostril. Then a mixture of eggs and milk
were poured down the tube, causing nausea and terrible choking. Emily was force
fed 49 times…
It is
perhaps not surprising that the psychological impact of this was so great that
Emily tried to commit suicide whilst she was in prison. She threw herself over
a balcony, cracking her skull and bruising her ribs. She was still force fed
again that night.
So in the
Summer of 1913, Emily had no money, couldn’t get a job because of her prison
record, and was growing dispirited that the Suffragette campaigns were not
achieving their aims and women would never get the vote. Perhaps she thought
even more desperate measures were needed to convince the establishment and the
wider public of the suffragette cause. Perhaps this is why she chose to attend
the Epsom Derby on 4 June 1913.
The day
before she had attended a WSPU summer festival and told her friend (whilst
standing next to a statue of Joan of Arc, the famous French martyr) to expect
something spectacular the next day. On Derby Day she bought a ticket to
Tattenham Corner station, walked the short distance to the course and waited
for the race, along with 100s of thousands of others.
As the
horses thundered around, Emily ducked under the railing, in full view of the
cameras recording the race. She allowed a few horses to go round and then stood
right in front of the King’s horse, Amner, rode by the jockey Herbert Jones.
There was clearly no time to stop – the horse began to rear but knocked Emily
clean over, throwing the jockey off as well. Crowds of people poured on to the
track. The jockey suffered minor injuries and made a full recovery. Emily,
however, was unconscious. She was taken to Epsom hospital, but died of her
injuries four days later.
The
suffragette leaders quickly realised the propaganda value of Emily’s death, and
she was given an enormous funeral procession with thousands lining the streets
of Bloomsbury in London to see her coffin go by. Emmeline Pankhurst suggested that "Emily clung to her conviction
that one great tragedy, the deliberate throwing into the breach of human life,
would put an end to the intolerable torture of women. And so she threw herself
at the King's horse in full view of the King and Queen and a great multitude of
their Majesties' subjects".
But
was Emily really a martyr? Did she intend to kill herself that day? Her
possessions that day included two flags pinned into her jacket, a ticket to a
summer festival later that day, and a return railway ticket. This suggests that
her motives might have been rather different – that she wanted to cause a scene
to stop the race, perhaps even plant a flag on the king’s horse, but
underestimated the speed of the animals. I am not sure about this. Everything I
have read about Emily suggests that she was a highly intelligent and rational woman,
and I find it hard to believe that she would have failed to account for the
speed and power of a charging race horse like this. I think she understood the
nature of the risk she was taking, and was prepared to accept the consequences
because her ultimate goal was so important.
Our
news headlines today bring forward other individuals who have risked everything
for their cause. Nelson Mandela spent 27 years in prison for campaigning
against apartheid. Protestors in Egypt are putting themselves in increasing
danger in their campaigns against the government. Edward Snowden faces
extradition and arrest for revealing the extent of the National Security
Agency’s surveillance campaign, which he believed was important to bring the
public’s attention. It will be interesting to see how historians will evaluate
his reputation in the years to come.
Emily
would have had sympathy with them. It is not clear whether her actions on their
own contributed to women achieving the vote – certainly women’s support for the
war effort during the First World War had much to do with this. However, in
1918 a limited number of women were granted the vote, and 10 years later they
final achieved electoral equality with men – with all women over 21 achieving
the vote. Emily Davison’s ambitions had been realised, although there were
still many campaigns for women’s rights to be fought.
I
would like to end with some of her own words, followed by a moment to reflect
on their implication for ourselves, should we ever find ourselves having to
take a risk for something we believe is worth fighting for, even if there is a
clear cost to ourselves. This is what she had to say:
“The
glorious and inscrutable spirit of liberty has but one further penalty in its
power – the surrender of life itself. To lay down life for friends, that is
glorious, selfless, inspiring, but to re-enact the tragedy of Calvary for
generations yet unborn, that is the last and consummate sacrifice of the
militant. Nor will she shrink from this Nirvana. She will be faithful to the
last.”
If you have
been inspired by Emily and the Suffragettes, I suggest that you get involved in
the Feminist Society, who meet regularly on Wednesday lunchtimes. You can also find
links to articles I used to research this assembly on the Nonsuch History and
Politics blog – nonsuchhp.blogspot.com. Thank
you.
No comments:
Post a Comment